Très intéréssante initiative oui! Ce serait intéréssant de savoir comment notre Cour Supreme interprete la constitution.
Voici le chapitre 6e Article 59 de la Constitution de Maurice.
-
Ministers
(1) There shall be a Prime Minister and a Deputy Prime Minister who shall be appointed by the President.
(2) There shall be, in addition to the offices of Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Minister and Attorney-General, such other offices of Minister of the Government as may be prescribed by Parliament or, subject to any law, established by the President, acting in accordance with the advice of the Prime Minister:
Provided that the number of offices of Minister, other than the Prime Minister, shall not be more than 24.
(3) The President, acting in his own deliberate judgment, shall appoint as Prime Minister the member of the Assembly who appears to him best able to command the support of the majority of the members of the Assembly, and shall, acting in accordance with the advice of the Prime Minister, appoint the Deputy Prime Minister, the Attorney-General and the other Ministers from among the members of the Assembly:
Provided that –
(a) where occasion arises for making an appointment while Parliament is dissolved, a person who was a member of the Assembly immediately before the dissolution may be appointed; and
(b) a person may be appointed Attorney-General, notwithstanding that he is not (or, as the case may be, was not) a member of the Assembly.
On notera que la Constitution parle de "The Deputy Prime Minister" et de "The Attorney General" et de "other ministers"
Donc stricto sensu la Constitution
précise bien qu'il n'y a qu'un seul vice Premier ministre tout comme il n'y a qu'un Attorney General (Ministre de la Justice). L'interpretation à donner semble donc claire.
Mais c'est une opinion d'un ancien étudiant en droit...de l'école française en plus
Cela n'engage que moi!
